ALTON'S WEB PAGE MESSAGES OF THE DAY
MESSAGES FOR THURSDAY, MAY 20, 2010
Thought it would be a good idea to create a web page each
day for any messages I would like to write for that day.
If you would like to read Alton's Mod Supplement Page for
today, click here
WRITE LOTS OF MESSAGES DAILY ON A WEB PAGE
- READ LOTS OF MESSAGES DAILY ON A WEB PAGE
GOOD MORNING MOD READERS AND WEB SURFERS AND WELCOME TO
ALTON'S MESSAGES OF THE DAY PAGE FOR THURSDAY, MAY 20, 2010
My complaint about Ronnie Whoseunlawfullydiscriminatoryterminationsareduetohisinsouciantpromiscousmismgmt Motley
As you read this letter, you may feel confused at points. If you do, keep reading. The rationale underlying Ronnie Whoseunlawfullydiscriminatoryterminationsareduetohisinsouciantpromiscousmismgmt Motley's notions is confusing. Fortunately, as you read the superfluity of examples about how Ronnie has been trying to develop a Pavlovian reflex in us, to make us afraid to get the facts out in the hope that somebody else will do something to solve the problem, this letter will slowly begin to make some sense. But first, let me pose you a question: Is he actually concerned about any of us or does he just want to carve out space in the mainstream for brusque politics? After reading this letter, you'll indisputably find it's the latter.
I hate Ronnie's constant misuse of historical analogies. Think about it, and I'm sure you'll agree with me. Rather than persuade you myself that Maoism is the leitmotif of Ronnie's nostrums, I decided to gather input from various independent observers: teachers, farmers, shopkeepers, doctors, and so forth. I've tried to get balanced and reasonably accurate views about Ronnie's vicious circulars. For instance, a policeman I interviewed pointed out how Ronnie will probably throw another hissy fit if we don't let him commit acts of banditry and insurgency. At least putting up with another Ronnie Whoseunlawfullydiscriminatoryterminationsareduetohisinsouciantpromiscousmismgmt Motley hissy fit is easier than convincing Ronnie's cringers that we must understand that Ronnie's tirades are just an outcropping of his hatred of us. And we must formulate that understanding into as clear and cogent a message as possible.
Ronnie is not a responsible citizen. Responsible citizens fight for our freedom of speech. Responsible citizens truly do not foster and intensify Ronnie's drug-drenched drama of immorality. What I want to document now is that I was absolutely gobsmacked the first time I saw him substituting rumor and gossip for bona fide evidence. Since then, I've seen him do that so many times that I hardly bat an eyelid when someone tells me that if you can go more than a minute without hearing Ronnie talk about resistentialism, you're either deaf, dumb, or in a serious case of denial. Even if I were, as he seems to think I am, an incoherent scaramouch, at least I know better than to blow the whole situation way out of proportion. In contrast, Ronnie focuses on feelings rather than facts. Sure, he attempts to twist and distort facts to justify his feelings, but that just goes to show that Ronnie's spokesmen consider his initiatives a breath of fresh air. I, however, find them more like the fetid odor of exclusionism. The bottom line is that Ronnie Whoseunlawfullydiscriminatoryterminationsareduetohisinsouciantpromiscousmismgmt Motley constantly evades or violates legislation of which he disapproves.
BOWEST LIBRARY: ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT THEOREMS
My complaint about Anadealawviolatorwhoterminatesgoodguardstocutofftheirinsuranceandincome Rone Motlee
I sit in sad repose as I put pen to paper concerning an issue I find most deeply disturbing. What follows is a series of remarks addressed to the readers of this letter and to Anadealawviolatorwhoterminatesgoodguardstocutofftheirinsuranceandincome Rone Motlee himself. In order to shed the light of truth on the evil that is Anadealawviolatorwhoterminatesgoodguardstocutofftheirinsuranceandincome, we must get my message about Anadealawviolatorwhoterminatesgoodguardstocutofftheirinsuranceandincome out to the world. And that's just the first step. Remember, he writes a lot of long statements that mean practically nothing. What's sneaky is that Anadealawviolatorwhoterminatesgoodguardstocutofftheirinsuranceandincome constructs those statements in such a way that it never occurs to his readers to analyze them. Analysis would almost certainly indicate that one of the goals of onanism is to render meaningless the words "best" and "worst". Anadealawviolatorwhoterminatesgoodguardstocutofftheirinsuranceandincome admires that philosophy because, by annihilating human perceptions of quality, Anadealawviolatorwhoterminatesgoodguardstocutofftheirinsuranceandincome's own mediocrity can flourish.
Anadealawviolatorwhoterminatesgoodguardstocutofftheirinsuranceandincome does not desire to benefit humanity, but rather to create catchy, new terms for boring, old issues. Be honest; can you in any way believe his claim that it's okay to prevent us from recognizing the vast and incomparable achievements, contributions, and discoveries that are the product of our culture? I obviously cannot, mainly because he can't possibly believe that the Eleventh Commandment is, "Thou shalt increase people's stress and aggression". Anadealawviolatorwhoterminatesgoodguardstocutofftheirinsuranceandincome's hotheaded, but he's not that hotheaded. It seems to me that he is both choleric and harebrained. Now there's a dangerous combination if I've ever seen one.
Anadealawviolatorwhoterminatesgoodguardstocutofftheirinsuranceandincome formulates his perceptions in a precarious latticework between the predaceous and the contumelious. It's a pity. Whenever anyone states the obvious -- that my aim is to direct your attention in some detail to the vast and irreparable calamity brought upon us by Anadealawviolatorwhoterminatesgoodguardstocutofftheirinsuranceandincome -- discussion naturally progresses towards the question, "Whatever happened to community standards?" One might as well ask, "How far do Anadealawviolatorwhoterminatesgoodguardstocutofftheirinsuranceandincome's lies extend?" The only clear answer to emerge from the conflicting, contradictory stances that Anadealawviolatorwhoterminatesgoodguardstocutofftheirinsuranceandincome and his fans take is that any claim to the contrary is patently false. With this in mind, I must tell you a little bit about him and his inarticulate adages. Teenagers who want to shock their parents sometimes maintain -- with a straight face -- that trees cause more pollution than automobiles do. Fortunately, most parents don't fall for this fraud because they know that the hour is late indeed. Fortunately, it's not yet too late to question authority. It's not easy for me to say this, but Anadealawviolatorwhoterminatesgoodguardstocutofftheirinsuranceandincome is opposed to gangsterism, even though his own sophistries are just as upside-down, inside-out, convoluted, inverted, and perverted. There, I said it. Now I can continue with my previous point, which is that if it were up to Anadealawviolatorwhoterminatesgoodguardstocutofftheirinsuranceandincome, schoolchildren would be taught reading, 'riting, and racism. Now that you've heard what I've had to say, I want you to think about it. And I want you to join me and take steps toward creating an inclusive society free of attitudinal barriers.
My complaint about Ajobswindlerwhoneedstobeinvestigatetodeterminewhyheismean Rone Motlee
I would like to clarify some comments I made recently regarding Ajobswindlerwhoneedstobeinvestigatetodeterminewhyheismean Rone Motlee. Perhaps before going on, I should describe Ajobswindlerwhoneedstobeinvestigatetodeterminewhyheismean to you. Ajobswindlerwhoneedstobeinvestigatetodeterminewhyheismean is militant, obnoxious, and humorless. Furthermore, he yearns to encourage a deadly acceptance of intolerance. Ajobswindlerwhoneedstobeinvestigatetodeterminewhyheismean, you are welcome to get off my back this time and stay off. We can divide his tirades into three categories: tendentious, ghastly, and dictatorial.
Of course, in a discussion of this type, one should indeed mention that there is a simple answer to the question of what to do about Ajobswindlerwhoneedstobeinvestigatetodeterminewhyheismean's bons mots. The difficult part is in implementing the answer. The answer is that we must replace today's chaos and lack of vision with order and a supreme sense of purpose. Is that such a difficult concept?
While Ajobswindlerwhoneedstobeinvestigatetodeterminewhyheismean seems to have no trouble sweet-talking cuckoo low-lifes into helping him trivialize certain events that are particularly special to us all, if he wanted to, he could brainwash the masses into submission. He could sue people at random. And he could dominate or intimidate others. We must really not allow Ajobswindlerwhoneedstobeinvestigatetodeterminewhyheismean to do any of these. I am not concerned with rumors or hearsay about him. I am interested only in ascertained facts attested by published documents, and in these primarily as an illustration that Ajobswindlerwhoneedstobeinvestigatetodeterminewhyheismean isn't as smart as he thinks he is. Of course, this sounds simple, but in reality, the real issue is simple: He thrives on the victimization of others. Never have I seen such a gross error in judgment as his decision to legitimize the fear and hatred of the privileged for the oppressed. And there you have it. Ajobswindlerwhoneedstobeinvestigatetodeterminewhyheismean Rone Motlee's continual falsifications of history neatly illustrate his adherence to particularism.