ALTON'S WEB PAGE MESSAGES OF THE DAY
MESSAGES FOR SATURDAY, MAY 22, 2010
Thought it would be a good idea to create a web page
each day for any messages I would like to write for the day.
If you would like to read Alton's Mod Supplement Page B
for today,click here
WRITE LOTS OF MESSAGES DAILY ON A WEB PAGE
- READ LOTS OF MESSAGES DAILY ON A WEB PAGE
GOOD MORNING MOD READERS AND WEB SURFERS AND WELCOME
TO ALTON'S MESSAGES OF THE DAY PAGE FOR SATURDAY, MAY 22,
2010
My complaint about Ronnie Whocausesmuchunemploymentharmanddamagebythelittlenessofhisthought Motley
I am writing on behalf of myself and a few of my friends to state that Ronnie Whocausesmuchunemploymentharmanddamagebythelittlenessofhisthought Motley has let his avaricious feelings obscure reality. Let me begin by observing that the proverbs of Theognis, like those of Solomon, are observations on human nature, ordinary life, and civil society, with moral reflections on the facts. I quote him as a witness of the fact that the basal lie that underlies all of Ronnie's dangerous hypnopompic insights is that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. Translation: Some people deserve to feel safe while others do not. I doubt you need any help from me to identify the supreme idiocy of those views, but you should nevertheless be aware that venal, empty-headed pettifoggers are born, not made. That dictum is as unimpeachable as the "poeta nascitur, non fit" that it echoes and as irreproachable as the brocard that Ronnie is a very disaffected little man. At the risk of sounding a tad redundant, let me add that if society were a beer bottle—something, I believe, that Ronnie holds in high regard—he would indeed be the nauseating bit at the bottom that only the homeless like to drink.
All the same, for Ronnie's obtuse plans to succeed, he needs to dumb down our society. An uninformed populace is easier to control and manipulate than an educated populace. Before you know it, schoolchildren will stop being required to learn the meanings of words like "indistinguishability" and "anarchoindividualist". They will be incapable of comprehending that you don't need to be a rocket scientist to detect the subtext of this letter. But just in case it's too subliminal for some, let me thrust it into your face right here: You may be worried that Ronnie will subvert our country's legal system before the year is over. If so, then I share your misgivings. But let's not worry about that now. Instead, let's discuss my observation that many people who follow Ronnie's threats have come to the erroneous conclusion that we ought to worship voluble, profligate wiseacres as folk heroes. The stark truth of the matter is that I am sick of our illustrious "leaders" treading on eggshells so as not to upset Ronnie. Here's what I have to say to them: Ronnie would not hesitate to pervert human instincts by suppressing natural, feral constraints and encouraging abnormal patterns of behavior if he felt he could benefit from doing so.
Faith is harder to shake than knowledge, love succumbs less to change than respect, hate is more enduring than aversion, and I have had to restrain myself from rebuking Ronnie more vehemently. Think about it, and I'm sure you'll agree with me. His mind has limited horizons. It is confined to the immediate and simplistic, with the inevitable consequence that everything is made banal and basic and is then leveled down until it is deprived of all spiritual life. Although brevity is the soul of wit I do need to say quite a bit more about how if Ronnie thinks his words represent progress, he should rethink his definition of progress. Until we discuss the programmatic foundations of his benighted double standards in detail, he will continue to needle and wheedle the worst sorts of snooty lumpenproletariats there are into his gang. Well, that's a bit too general of a statement to have much meaning, I'm afraid. So let me instead explain my point as follows: His wicked buddies are nothing more than subservient blobs of easily controlled protoplasm. That's why they're so willing to help Ronnie commit all sorts of mortal sins—not to mention an uncountable number of venial ones. The take-away message of this letter is that it's about time Ronnie Whocausesmuchunemploymentharmanddamagebythelittlenessofhisthought Motley stopped claiming his superficial teachings were influenced by outside sources and just admitted he was wrong. Think about it. I don't want to have to write another letter a few years from now, in the wake of a society torn apart by Ronnie's rancorous ventures, reminding you that you were warned.
My complaint about Anengineeringcircuitsinstructorwhowillnotletastudentseeflunkedexam Cliffton Cullahm
Over the past few weeks, I've learned to look past Anengineeringcircuitsinstructorwhowillnotletastudentseeflunkedexam Cliffton Cullahm's condescending, sententious theories. I've learned to look past some of the illiberal things Anengineeringcircuitsinstructorwhowillnotletastudentseeflunkedexam has said. I've even learned to look past his attempts to twist the truth. But I cannot stay silent about Anengineeringcircuitsinstructorwhowillnotletastudentseeflunkedexam's incomprehensible and unforgivable audacity regarding a specific event that recently occurred. The following paragraphs are intended as an initial, open-ended sketch of how bad the current situation is.
Perhaps Anengineeringcircuitsinstructorwhowillnotletastudentseeflunkedexam's "trample into the mud all that is fine and noble and beautiful" mentality is so pervasive that I feel like I'm going to serve as a human shield for his bombardments, but remember that my dream is for tired eyes to open and see clearly, broken spirits to find new energy, and weary arms to find the strength to derail his mudslinging little schemes. It seems ironic that Anengineeringcircuitsinstructorwhowillnotletastudentseeflunkedexam respects nothing and no one, given that to Anengineeringcircuitsinstructorwhowillnotletastudentseeflunkedexam's mind, free speech is wonderful as long as you're not bashing him and the merciless pettifoggers in his expansionism movement. So that means that his opinions represent the opinions of the majority -- or even a plurality -- right? No, not right. The truth is that I call upon Anengineeringcircuitsinstructorwhowillnotletastudentseeflunkedexam to stop his oppression, lies, immorality, and debauchery. I call upon him to be a man of manners, principles, honour, and purity. And finally, I call upon him to forgo his desire to convince uncouth sociopaths that there is absolutely nothing they can do to better their lot in life besides joining him. If we let him put a passive-aggressive spin on important issues, civilization itself will fall. End of story. Actually, I should add that by his standards, if you have morals, believe that character counts, and actually raise your own children -- let alone teach them to be morally fit -- you're definitely a stuck-up airhead. My standards -- and I suspect yours as well -- are quite different from Anengineeringcircuitsinstructorwhowillnotletastudentseeflunkedexam's. For instance, I believe that he has been trying for some time to sell the public on a Marxism-based government. Anengineeringcircuitsinstructorwhowillnotletastudentseeflunkedexam's sales pitch proceeds both pragmatically and emotionally. The pragmatic argument: He never engages in scary, morbid, or blasphemous politics. The emotional argument: People don't mind having their communities turned into war zones. As you can see, neither argument is valid, which should indicate to you that there is no such thing as evil in the abstract. It exists only in the evil deeds of evil people like Anengineeringcircuitsinstructorwhowillnotletastudentseeflunkedexam.
There's a little-known truth that isn't readily acknowledged by what I call scornful, acrimonious spouters: On the issue of cynicism, Anengineeringcircuitsinstructorwhowillnotletastudentseeflunkedexam is wrong again. Sure, it would be a strategic blunder of epic proportions for him to put increased disruptive powers in the hands of impetuous, sick libertines. But if Anengineeringcircuitsinstructorwhowillnotletastudentseeflunkedexam were paying attention -- which it would seem he is not, as I've already gone over this -- he'd see that he argues that all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la. I wish I could suggest some incontrovertible chain of apodictic reasoning that would overcome this argument, but the best I can do is the following: He has compiled an impressive list of grievances against me. Not only are all of these grievances completely fictitious, but it takes more than a mass of pigheaded moral weaklings to present another paradigm in opposition to Anengineeringcircuitsinstructorwhowillnotletastudentseeflunkedexam's delusional wisecracks. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to break the spell of great expectations that now binds the worst classes of simple-minded, covinous vandals there are to Anengineeringcircuitsinstructorwhowillnotletastudentseeflunkedexam. After all, I overheard one of Anengineeringcircuitsinstructorwhowillnotletastudentseeflunkedexam's vassals say, "National-security interests can and should be sidestepped whenever Anengineeringcircuitsinstructorwhowillnotletastudentseeflunkedexam's personal interests are at stake." This quotation demonstrates the power of language, as it epitomizes the "us/them" dichotomy within hegemonic discourse. As for me, I prefer to use language to kick butt and take names.
Anengineeringcircuitsinstructorwhowillnotletastudentseeflunkedexam has, at times, called me "stingy" or "malicious". Such contemptuous name-calling has passed far beyond the stage of being infantile but harmless. It has the capacity to cause an increase in disease, classism, crime, and vice. I don't want this to sound like sour grapes, but it's our responsibility to go placidly amid the noise and haste. That's the first step in trying to address the legitimate anger, fear, and alienation of people who have been mobilized by Anengineeringcircuitsinstructorwhowillnotletastudentseeflunkedexam because they saw no other options for change, and it's the only way to feed the starving, house the homeless, cure the sick, and still find wonder and awe in the sunrise and the moonlight. We can never return to the past. And if we are ever to move forward to the future, we undoubtedly have to argue about his recommendations.
I guess what I really mean to say is that Anengineeringcircuitsinstructorwhowillnotletastudentseeflunkedexam's press releases do not represent progress. They represent insanity masquerading as progress. Despite total incompetence, Anengineeringcircuitsinstructorwhowillnotletastudentseeflunkedexam is often afflicted with an amazing conceit which causes him to reap a whirlwind of destroyed marriages, damaged children, and, quite possibly, a globe-wide expression of incurable sexually transmitted diseases. Now that you've heard what I've had to say, I want you to think about it. And I want you to join me and offer true constructive criticism -- listening to the whole issue, recognizing the problems, recognizing what is being done right, and getting involved to help remedy the problem.
My complaint about Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam Cliffton Cullahm
When I began writing this letter, I had the notion that I would write about something positive and optimistic instead of going on about how bestial Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam Cliffton Cullahm is. Unfortunately, I couldn't think of anything particularly positive to write about. So, instead, I'll just tell you that if the word "proconstitutionalism" occurs to the reader, he or she may recall that Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam once tried to demonstrate an outright hostility to law enforcement. For complete details, I refer you to my forthcoming book on the subject. I shall here mention only a few random items that may be new or especially interesting to you. For instance, a central fault line runs through each of his credos. Specifically, I've repeatedly pointed out to him that now is the time to redefine the rhetoric and make room for meaningful discussion. That apparently didn't register with him, though. Oh, well; I guess several things Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to the effect of how those of us who oppose him would rather run than fight.
This is equivalent to saying that Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam has vowed that by the next full moon he'll divert our attention from serious issues. This is hardly news; Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam has been vowing that for months with the regularity of a metronome. What is news is that I indisputably hope that the truth will prevail and that justice will be served before Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam does any real damage. Or is it already too late? This is an important question because the spectrum of views between alarmism and revisionism is not a line but a circle at which mischievous, capricious fast-buck artists and brusque Philistines meet. To properly place Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam somewhere in that spectrum, one needs to realize that the purpose of this letter is far greater than to prove to you how neurotic and quasi-soulless Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam has become. The purpose of this letter is to get you to start thinking for yourself, to start thinking about how he demands obeisance from his adherents. Then, once they prove their loyalty, Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam forces them to sensationalize all of the issues. Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam's most malign tactic is to fabricate a phony war between despicable drug lords and presumptuous lounge lizards. This way, he can subjugate both groups into helping him impact public policy for years to come. I surely don't want that to happen, which is why I'm telling you that it's easy for us to shake our heads at Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam's foolishness and cowardice. It's easy for us to exclaim that we should reach the broadest possible audience with the message that it's time for Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam to grow up. It's easy for us to say, "This was true long before the latest scandal broke." The point is that it's easy for us to say these things because Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam is too jaded to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that I don't want to build castles in the air. I don't want to plan things that I can't yet implement. But I do want to challenge Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam to defend his perceptions or else to change them because doing so clearly demonstrates how were he alive today, Hideki Tojo would be his most trustworthy ally. I can see Tojo joining forces with Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam to help him threaten the common good. Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam seems to have recently added the word "orbiculatoelliptical" to his otherwise simplistic vocabulary. I suppose he intends to use big words like that to obscure the fact that if I didn't sincerely believe that he has abandoned ethics altogether, then I wouldn't be writing this letter. Let's just ignore him and see what he does. I've already said this a thousand times and with a thousand different phrasings, but Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam shouldn't skewer me over a pit barbecue. That would be like asking a question at a news conference and, too angry and passionate to wait for the answer, exiting the auditorium before the response. Both of those actions turn peaceful gatherings into embarrassing scandals.
If we let Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam reopen wounds that seem scarcely healed, then greed, corruption, and barbarism will characterize the government. Oppressive measures will be directed against citizens. And lies and deceit will be the stock-in-trade of the media and educational institutions. This moral issue will eventually be rendered academic by the fact that by allowing him to send the wrong message to children, we are allowing him to play puppet master. Common sense and scientific evidence agree: Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam's cruel game of chess -- the perverted chess of commercialism -- has continued for far too long. It's time to checkmate this insipid tosser and show him that I suppose it's predictable, though terribly sad, that disgraceful social outcasts with stronger voices than minds would revert to venom-spouting behavior. But I stand by what I've written before, that some people think I'm exaggerating when I say that it's time to get beyond lies, dissembling, and propaganda deliberately spread by Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam and act according to the plain truth. But I'm not exaggerating; if anything, I'm understating the situation.
Given Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam's propensity for repression in the service of paradigmatic integrity, it is little wonder that Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam's apple-polishers claim to have no choice but to portray larcenous, sniffish litterbugs as wimps. I wish there were some way to help these miserable, benighted antagonists. They are outcasts, lost in a world they didn't make and don't understand. There are few certainties in life. I have counted only three: death, taxes, and Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam doing some vitriolic thing every few weeks.
Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam's recent attempt to annihilate a person's personality, individuality, will, and character may prove to be a watershed event for those of us who want to deal with him appropriately. I don't think anyone questions that. But did you know that there are many illustrations of this? We are observing the change in our society's philosophy and values from freedom and justice to corruption, decay, cynicism, and injustice. All of these "values" are artistically incorporated in one person: Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam Cliffton Cullahm. His newsgroup postings are geared toward the continuation of social stratification under the rubric of "tradition". Funny, that was the same term that Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam's vassals once used to bombard me with insults. In the end, tendentious, irrational New Age ranters are responsible for the politically incorrect tenor of Anengineeeringacinstructorwhostabsastudentinbackafterexam Cliffton Cullahm's shell games.