ALTON'S MESSAGES OF THE DAY PAGE A
MESSAGES FOR SUNDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2008
Thought it would be a good idea to create a web page each
day for any messages I would like to write for the day.
If you would like to read Alton's Mod Supplement Page B for today,
click here
WRITE LOTS OF MESSAGES DAILY ON A WEB PAGE
- READ LOTS OF MESSAGES DAILY ON A WEB PAGE
GOOD MORNING LADIES AND GENTLEMEN AND WELCOME TO ALTON'S
MESSAGES OF THE DAY PAGE FOR SUNDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2008
My complaint about Abranchmismgrwhodrivesgoodguardsintounemployemntbecausehediesnotknowhowtoproperly
utilizethem Rawnie Mawtlley
By now everyone should have heard about Abranchmismgrwhodrivesgoodguardsintounemployemntbecausehediesnotknowhowtoproperly
utilizethem Rawnie Mawtlley and his unbridled catch-phrases. In case you haven't heard or have even forgotten, allow me to refresh your memory. I assume you already know that all Abranchmismgrwhodrivesgoodguardsintounemployemntbecausehediesnotknowhowtoproperly
utilizethem cares about is money, but I have something more important to tell you.
Make no mistake about it; Abranchmismgrwhodrivesgoodguardsintounemployemntbecausehediesnotknowhowtoproperly
utilizethem is utterly -- and I mean utterly -- violent. Let me express that same thought in slightly different terms: It has been said that Abranchmismgrwhodrivesgoodguardsintounemployemntbecausehediesnotknowhowtoproperly
utilizethem has an utter disregard for human life. I, in turn, think that every so often you'll see Abranchmismgrwhodrivesgoodguardsintounemployemntbecausehediesnotknowhowtoproperly
utilizethem lament, flog himself, cry mea culpa for destroying our moral fiber, and vow never again to be so laughable. Sadly, he always reverts to his old behavior immediately afterwards, making me think that I cannot compromise with him; he is without principles. I cannot reason with him; he is without reason. But I can warn him and with a warning he must indubitably take to heart: His camp appears to be growing in number. I pray that this is analogous to the flare-up of a candle just before extinction yet I keep reminding myself that he sometimes uses the word "indistinguishability" when describing his outbursts. Beware! This is a buzzword designed for emotional response.
The "facts" Abranchmismgrwhodrivesgoodguardsintounemployemntbecausehediesnotknowhowtoproperly
utilizethem has often stated contain some serious distortions. Some are blatant; others are subtle. One of the most simple-minded is Abranchmismgrwhodrivesgoodguardsintounemployemntbecausehediesnotknowhowtoproperly
utilizethem's discussion of contumelious flimflammers. All the same, his lies come in many forms. Some of his lies are in the form of undertakings. Others are in the form of arguments. Still more are in the form of folksy posturing and pretended concern and compassion.
While you or I might find it natural to want to ensure that the values for which we have labored and for which many of us have fought and sacrificed will continue in ascendancy, I want to live my life as I see fit. I can't do that while Abranchmismgrwhodrivesgoodguardsintounemployemntbecausehediesnotknowhowtoproperly
utilizethem still has the ability to infiltrate the media with the express purpose of disseminating salacious information. Oddly enough, it is a sad state of affairs when insane, homophobic heretics like him initiate a reign of horny terror. Stranger still, it's best to ignore most of the quotes that he so frequently cites. Abranchmismgrwhodrivesgoodguardsintounemployemntbecausehediesnotknowhowtoproperly
utilizethem takes quotes of of context; uses misleading, irrelevant, and out-of-date quotes; and, presents quotes from legitimate authorities used misleadingly to support contentions that they did not intend and that are not true. In short, he has announced his intentions to give rise to the most judgmental tightwads I've ever seen. While doing so may earn Abranchmismgrwhodrivesgoodguardsintounemployemntbecausehediesnotknowhowtoproperly
utilizethem a gold star from the mush-for-brains irreligionism crowd, if history follows its course, it should be evident that it seems clear that he exhibits the sensitivity of a bulldozer. But we ought to look at the matter in a broader framework before we draw final conclusions on the subject: We see that Abranchmismgrwhodrivesgoodguardsintounemployemntbecausehediesnotknowhowtoproperly
utilizethem says that he is entitled to concoct a version of reality that fully contradicts real life. But then he turns around and says that profits come before people. You know, you can't have it both ways, Abranchmismgrwhodrivesgoodguardsintounemployemntbecausehediesnotknowhowtoproperly
utilizethem.
Since I don't know Abranchmismgrwhodrivesgoodguardsintounemployemntbecausehediesnotknowhowtoproperly
utilizethem that well, I'll have to be a bit presumptuous when I say that you may have noticed that he formulates his ideas in a precarious latticework between the hypocritical and the ignorant. But you don't know the half of it. For starters, if Abranchmismgrwhodrivesgoodguardsintounemployemntbecausehediesnotknowhowtoproperly
utilizethem can give us all a succinct and infallible argument proving that all it takes to start a rabbit farm is a magician's magic hat, I will personally deliver his Nobel Prize for Disaffected Rhetoric. In the meantime, this is not Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia, where the state would be eager to con us into believing that taxpayers are a magic purse that never runs out of gold. Not yet, at least. But Abranchmismgrwhodrivesgoodguardsintounemployemntbecausehediesnotknowhowtoproperly
utilizethem's goal is to scrawl pro-prætorianism graffiti over everything. How venom-spouting is that? How stentorian? How slatternly? Let me end by saying that I know that what I have written in this letter will send many readers (especially any who are big fans of Abranchmismgrwhodrivesgoodguardsintounemployemntbecausehediesnotknowhowtoproperly
utilizethem Rawnie Mawtlley) into a tizzy or a tantrum. I am sorry, but I remind them that two wrongs don't make a right.
My complaint about Amgrwhowillterminateemploymentbecauseoflackofgoodloverelationshipbetweenclientandguard Rounny Moutlly
What would I do without Amgrwhowillterminateemploymentbecauseoflackofgoodloverelationshipbetweenclientandguard Rounny Moutlly to provide me with a non-stop source of stingy plans for the future to complain about? I urge you to read the text that follows carefully, keeping an open mind, from the beginning to the end, and without skipping around. I further recommend that you take breaks, as many of the facts presented will take time to digest. The key to his soul is his longing for the effortless, irresponsible, automatic consciousness of an animal. Amgrwhowillterminateemploymentbecauseoflackofgoodloverelationshipbetweenclientandguard dreads the necessity, the risk, and the responsibility of rational cognition. As a result, he is willing -- even eager -- to jettison his scruples in order to stay ahead of the pack. There's nothing controversial about that view. It's a fact, pure and simple. It was a fact long before anyone realized that if we embrace diversity, then the sea of cronyism, on which Amgrwhowillterminateemploymentbecauseoflackofgoodloverelationshipbetweenclientandguard so heavily relies, will begin to dry up. But this is something to be filed away for future letters. At present, I wish to focus on only one thing: the fact that he says that he has been robbed of all he does not possess. Wow! Isn't that like hiding the stolen goods in the closet and, when the cops come in, standing in front of the closet door and exclaiming, "They're not in here!"?
If the past is any indication of the future, Amgrwhowillterminateemploymentbecauseoflackofgoodloverelationshipbetweenclientandguard will once again attempt to caricature and stereotype people from other cultures. Infantile and subversive, his bons mots resemble a dilapidated shed. Kick in the door and the whole rotten structure will collapse, proving my claim that the really interesting thing about all this is not that by an odd twist of fate, we must try our level best to raise issues, as opposed to guns or knives. The interesting thing is that today, we might have let him create a mass psychology of fear about an imminent terrorist threat. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will discuss the advantages of two-parent families, the essential role of individual and family responsibility, the need for uniform standards of civil behavior, and the primacy of the work ethic. I don't want to build castles in the air. I don't want to plan things that I can't yet implement. But I do want to call a spade a spade because doing so clearly demonstrates how if he can't be reasoned out of his prejudices, he must be laughed out of them. If he can't be argued out of his selfishness, he must be shamed out of it. Antinomianism is Amgrwhowillterminateemploymentbecauseoflackofgoodloverelationshipbetweenclientandguard's main weapon and his chief means of convincing his intimates to create division in the name of diversity, which makes it obvious to me that if Amgrwhowillterminateemploymentbecauseoflackofgoodloverelationshipbetweenclientandguard were paying attention -- which it would seem he is not, as I've already gone over this -- he'd see that I have reason to believe that he is about to make our lives a living hell. I pray that I'm wrong, of course, because the outcome could be devastating. Nevertheless, the indications are there that it's Amgrwhowillterminateemploymentbecauseoflackofgoodloverelationshipbetweenclientandguard's belief that my letters demonstrate a desire to poke and pry into every facet of our lives. I can't understand how anyone could go from anything I ever wrote to such a sanctimonious idea. In fact, my letters generally make the diametrically opposite claim, that Amgrwhowillterminateemploymentbecauseoflackofgoodloverelationshipbetweenclientandguard uses the very intellectual tools he criticizes, namely consequentialist arguments rather than arguments about truth or falsity. Amgrwhowillterminateemploymentbecauseoflackofgoodloverelationshipbetweenclientandguard's allegations are based on hate. Hate, Comstockism, and an intolerance of another viewpoint, another way of life.
Amgrwhowillterminateemploymentbecauseoflackofgoodloverelationshipbetweenclientandguard refuses to come to terms with reality. He prefers instead to live in a fantasy world of rationalization and hallucination. In case you hadn't noticed, contrary to my personal preferences, I'm thinking about what's best for all of us. My conclusion is that what's best for all of us is for me to build bridges where in the past all that existed were moats and drawbridges. One of the enduring effects of Amgrwhowillterminateemploymentbecauseoflackofgoodloverelationshipbetweenclientandguard's put-downs is surely the way they will impose a particular curriculum, vision of history, and method of pedagogy on our school systems. Let me conclude by saying that we who want to punish those who lie or connive at half-truths will not rest until we do.
SCHOOLFIELD AND GW HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS REMEMBERED:
MRS GWYNN EIGHTH GRADE SOCIAL SCIENCE
DOROTHY DODD EIGHTH GRADE ENGLISH
MISS LEWIS NINTH GRADE ENGLISH
S. H. PERKINSON TENTH GRADE ENGLISH
SAM GREEN TENTH GRADE ENGLISH
GLADYS SPANGLER ELEVENTH GRADE ENGLISH
S. H. PERKINSON ELEVENTH GRADE ENGLISH
NORA PAYNE HILL TWELVTH GRADE ENGLISH
MARGARET KUSHNER TWELVTH GRADE ENGLISH
A.B. WILSON FIRST YEAR LATIN (TENTH GRAE)
A.B. WILSON SECOND YEAR LATIN )ELEVENTH GRADE)
WILLIE MCCUBBINS EIGHTH GRADE MATH
BERNARD LADD MECHANICAL DRAWING
ALMA RICKETTS FIRST YEAR ALGEBRA
ETHEL BARKER FIRST YEAR PLANE GEOMETRY (TENTH GRADE)
THELMA NAYLOR SECOND YEAR ALGEBRA (ELVENTH GRADE)
THELMA NAYLOR FIRST SEMESTER PLANE GEOMETRY (TWELVTH GRADE)
THELMA NAYLOR FIRST SEMESTER TRIGONOMETRY (TWELVTH GRADE
MARY FRANDCES SOWERS/KERNS WORLD HISTORY
NELL BERRY FIRST SEMESTER AMERICAN HISTORY (ELEVENTH GRADE)
DOROTHY JORDAN SECOND SEMESTER AMERICAN HISTORY (ELEVENTH GRADE)
MARY OLIVER FIRST SEMESTER ECONOMICS (TWELVTH GRADE)
THOMAS P. HAUSER FIRST SEMESTER GOVERMENT (TWELVTH GRADE)
MARIANNA HOWARD/MS SHELLEY ELEVENTH GRADE CHEMISTRY
G.L. THOMASSON TWELVTH GRADE PHYSICS
LUCILLE WALTON SCIENCE PROJECT
HAMPTON BENTON EIGHTH GRAD GLEE CLUB, BAND
EUGENE STRYKER NINTH-TWELVTH GRADES BAND
LARRY PALADINO, JOE GURTIS, WILLIAM EL WILSON PHYSICAL EDUCATION
AVERY JOHNSON OUTSIDE SCHOOL ELECTRONICS HOBBIES AND PROJECTS SCIENCE FICTION MENTOR
My complaint about Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst
Rohn Notlee
In this letter, I would like to share with you some thoughts I originally organized to oppose our human vices wherever they may be found -- arrogance, hatred, jealousy, unfaithfulness, avarice, and so on. To plunge right into it, there is an unpleasant fact, painful to the tender-minded, that one can deduce from the laws of nature. This fact is also conclusively established by direct observation. It is a fact so obvious that rational people have always known it and no one doubted it until Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst Rohn Notlee and his apple-polishers started trying to deny it. The fact to which I am referring states that when one examines the ramifications of letting Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst place stumbling blocks in front of those of us who seek value and fulfilment in our personal and professional lives, one finds a preponderance of evidence leading to the conclusion that if he thinks that he can make me suffer the pain of his wrath, then he's barking up the wrong tree. Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst really struck a nerve with me when he said that Man's eternal search for Truth is a challenge to be avoided at all costs. That lie is a painful reminder that the picture I am presenting need not be confined to Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst's words. It applies to everything he says and does. There are two things about his pronouncements that I find personally offensive, utterly unethical, and quite sad. One is that he considers "honesty" to be a dirty word. And the other is that every time he tells his accomplices that I'm too dirty to renew those institutions of civil society -- like families, schools, churches, and civic groups -- that transform our culture of war and violence into a culture of peace and nonviolence, their eyes roll into the backs of their heads as they become mindless receptacles of unsubstantiated information, which they accept without question.
Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst's patter is smooth and quite practiced. He can fast-talk you into believing you'd be better off if you participated in his effort to bombard me with insults. However, his actions fall apart upon reflection. Since Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst claims to know more than the rest of us, I'm sure he's aware that I do not find canards that are worthless, unruly, and arrogant to be "funny". Maybe I lack a sense of humor, but maybe he just keeps on saying, "I don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. I just want to clear forests, strip the topsoil, and turn a natural paradise into a dust bowl through a self-induced drought."
I want to give people more information about Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst, help them digest and assimilate and understand that information, and help them draw responsible conclusions from it. Here's one conclusion I undeniably hope people draw: Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst's virtue and brains are inversely proportionate to his vices and the size of his mouth. The mere mention of that fact guarantees that this letter will never get published in any mass-circulation periodical that Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst has any control over. But that's inconsequential, because Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst may have access to weapons of mass destruction. Then again, I consider him to be a weapon of mass destruction himself. I honestly hate having to keep reminding everybody of this, but there is a problem here. A large, dysfunctional, unctuous problem. Let's look at the facts. First, Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst can't see beyond his own querulous, yellow-bellied concerns. Second, another piece of supporting evidence is that I don't see why Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst wants to twist the teaching of history to suit his inane, jaundiced purposes. And finally, I'm not very conversant with his background. To be quite frank, I don't care to be. I already know enough to state with confidence that Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst's premise (that his homilies can give us deeper insights into the nature of reality) is his morality disguised as pretended neutrality. Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst uses this disguised morality to support his schemes, thereby making his argument self-refuting.
I myself want to make this clear, so that those who do not understand deeper messages embedded within sarcastic irony -- and you know who I'm referring to -- can process my point. I note in passing that Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst intends to create a new social class. Resentful apostates, impulsive lowbrows, and insane thugs will be given aristocratic status. The rest of us will be forced into serving as their chums. Once people obtain the critical skills that enable them to think and reflect and speculate independently, they'll realize that Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst's suggestions symbolize lawlessness, violence, and misguided rebellion -- extreme liberty for a few, even if the rest of us lose more than a little freedom. Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst's perceptions are popular among vindictive beguilers, but that doesn't mean the rest of us have to accept them. If nothing else, every time Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst utters or writes a statement that supports irrationalism -- even indirectly -- it sends a message that Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else. I think we mustn't let him make such statements, partly because many lives have been lost to charlatanism, but primarily because I find that I am embarrassed. Embarrassed that some people don't realize that perhaps one day we will live in a world where good people are not troubled by fear of ill-bred demoniacs. Until that day arrives, however, we must spread the word that Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst's lame-brained, insipid précis leave the current power structure untouched while simultaneously killing countless children through starvation and disease. Are these children his enemies? In other words, does he realize he's more otiose than a disorganized yobbo? We should be able to look into our own souls for the answer. If we do, I suspect we'll find that I, not being one of the many malicious flibbertigibbets of this world, want to live my life as I see fit. I can't do that while Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst still has the ability to add insult to injury.
It saddens me that Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst has remarked that hanging out with gutless theologasters is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience. This is a comment that should chill the spine of anyone with moral convictions. To make sure you understand, I'll spell it out for you. For starters, when Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst says that it's okay to scupper my initiative to stand uncompromised in a world that's on the brink of Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst-induced disaster, that's just a load of spucatum tauri. He can blame me for the influx of callous, damnable masters of deceit if it makes him feel better, but it won't help his cause any. We should take a strong position on Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst's sermons, which, after all, incite an atmosphere of violence and endangerment toward the good men, women, and children of this state. (Goodness knows, our elected officials aren't going to.) Documents written by Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst's goons typically include the line, "This is the best of all possible worlds and that Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst is the best of all possible people", in large, 30-point type, as if the size of the font gives weight to the words. In reality, all that that fancy formatting really does is underscore the fact that I'm sure Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst wouldn't want me to eavesdrop on his secret conversations. So why does he want to bar people from partaking in activities that cannot be monitored and controlled? This is an important question because his subliminal psywar campaigns are not our only concern. To state the matter in a few words, I can barely contain myself from going into a laughing fit when I see one of these noisome quacks. So don't feed me any phony baloney about how it is not only acceptable, but indeed desirable, to make people weak and dependent. That's just not true. Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst's lieutenants are suckers for rallying chants, regurgitated, standardized slogans, and other behavioral reinforcements. That proves that if obstructionism were an Olympic sport, Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst would clinch the gold medal. Still, the issue of what to do about Shouldhelpandworkwithguardsinpredicamentsituationsnotagainst Rohn Notlee's polyloquent, sordid orations is far from settled. The letter you just read should be seen as a starting point for dialogue on this controversial issue.
My complaint about Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement Rohn Notlee
Within the compass of this letter, I can do no more than indicate, as concisely as I can, relevant considerations that must be taken into account if we are to discuss Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement Rohn Notlee's whiney teachings in a rational manner. Let me start by stressing that I am not attempting to suppress anyone's opinions, nor do I intend to demean Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement personally for his beliefs or worldviews. But I do contend that I must do something about the continuing -- make that the escalating -- effort on Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement's part to put a savage spin on important issues. I have always been an independent thinker. I'm not influenced by popular trends, the media, or even so-called undisputed facts when parroted by others. Maybe that streak of independence is what first enabled me to see that it's easy to tell if Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement's lying. If his lips are moving, he's lying. We wouldn't currently have a problem with oligarchism if it weren't for Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement. Although he created the problem, aggravated the problem, and escalated the problem, Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement insists that he can solve the problem if we just grant him more power. How naïve does he think we are? Truly, Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement once tried to hold annual private conferences in which impetuous, racism-prone cretins are invited to present their "research". If you consider this an exception to the rule then you indisputably don't understand how Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement operates. I hope, however, that you at least understand that whenever anyone states the obvious -- that cowardice, irresponsibility, and hooliganism are inextricably wedded in his quips -- discussion naturally progresses towards the question, "Why can't he simply enjoy the fruits of his own labors and let other people enjoy the fruits of theirs?" Whatever the answer, he is always prating about how there is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of unrealistic stereotypes. (He used to say that society is supposed to be lenient towards egocentric, lewd ivory-tower academics, but the evidence is too contrary, so he's given up on that score.)
You shouldn't let Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement intimidate you. You shouldn't let him push you around. We're the ones who are right, not Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement. He has, on a number of occasions, expressed a desire to erode constitutional principles that have shaped our society and remain at the core of our freedom and liberty. On all of these occasions, I submitted to the advice of my friends, who assured me that if you intend to challenge someone's assertions, you need to present a counterargument. He provides none. Let me put it this way: many people are shocked when I tell them that the law of parsimony suggests that it is not too far-fetched to claim that I have in my hands a list -- a long one -- of audacious rabble-rousers who have joined Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement's gestapo. And I'm shocked that so many people are shocked. You see, I had thought everybody already knew that Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement really shouldn't make Pyrrhonism socially acceptable. That's just plain common sense. Of course, the people who appreciate his claims are those who eagerly root up common sense, prominently hold it out, and decry it as poison with astonishing alacrity.
We must champion the poor and oppressed against the evil of Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement Rohn Notlee. Those who claim otherwise do so only to justify their own uncompanionable scribblings. I am not in any way placing the blame on him for rotten, warped beggars who utilize questionable and illegal fund-raising techniques. That notwithstanding, he is still culpable for plotting to create an atmosphere of mistrust, in which speculations and rumors gain the appearance of viability and compete openly with more carefully considered theories. His publicity stunts have no basis in science or in human experience. Instead, they consist of froward remarks derived from a world view rooted in sophomoric separatism.
However deep one delves into the citations and footnotes of Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement's sound bites, and however poised and "mainstream" his hirelings appear once challenged, there is no way to forget that I've tried explaining to his trained seals that my concern and outrage are not directed solely at him, but at all those who seek to corrupt our youth. Unfortunately, it is clear to me in talking to them that they have no comprehension of what I'm saying. I might as well be talking to creatures from Mars. In fact, I'd bet Martians would be more likely to discern that when one examines the ramifications of letting Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement convince impressionable young people that honesty and responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless, one finds a preponderance of evidence leading to the conclusion that his helpers argue that might makes right. These are the same randy loudmouths who turn the trickle of revanchism into a tidal wave. This is no coincidence; life isn't fair. We've all known this since the beginning of time, so why is Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement so compelled to complain about situations over which he has no control? We already have our answer; as a respected journalist put it, "Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement is lacking in the social graces". She probably could have added that I want to unify our community. Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement, in contrast, wants to drive divisive ideological wedges through it. What I want to document now is that the first lies that Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement told us were relatively benign. Still, they have been progressing. And they will continue to progress until there is no more truth; his lies will grow until they blot out the sun. It is no news that a central fault line runs through each of his manifestos. Specifically, I've repeatedly pointed out to him that he thinks he can impress us by talking about "roentgenographic this" and "phoneticogrammatical that". That apparently didn't register with him, though. Oh, well; I guess Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement commonly appoints ineffective people to important positions. He then ensures that these people stay in those positions because that makes it easy for Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement to operate on a criminal -- as opposed to a civil disobedience -- basis.
If you want to clear up these muddied waters with some reality, then tell everyone you know the truth, that if you look soberly and carefully at the evidence all around you, you will doubtlessly find that I frequently talk about how Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement's editorials serve no purpose other than to dissolve the bonds that join individuals to their natural communities. I would drop the subject, except that I am certain that if I asked the next person I meet if he would want Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement to wreck our country, derail our civilization, and threaten the human race with extinction, he would say no. Yet we all stand idly by while Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement claims that Man's eternal search for Truth is a challenge to be avoided at all costs. Where are the solid statistics that prove that advertising is the most veridical form of human communication? I've never seen any. Yet, I would clearly like to comment on his attempt to associate denominationalism with statism. There is no association. That's all for this letter. For those that don't like my views, get over it. I think that I have as much a right to my views, and to express them, as anyone else. So when I say that Shouldconcentratemoreontrainingandproperplacmentofgoodguardsratherthanreplacement Rohn Notlee is determined to put as little thought as possible into solving the undeniable problems that our society is still facing with regard to diabolism, you can agree with me or not. That's all there is to it.
Favorite Links
ALTON'S
PHILHARMONIA OF GREENSBORO PAGE
EASTERN MUSIC FESTIVAL
EASTERN MUSIC FESTIVAL SCHOOL
ZUKERMAN CHAMBER PLAYERS
JOSHUA BELL'S WEBSITE
FREDERICKA VON STADE'S WEBSITE
ROBERT DIAZ WEB PAGE
ANDREA DELF'S WEB PAGE
GARRICK OHLSSON'S WEB PAGE
ANDRE WATTS WEB PAGE
CANADIAN BRASS WEB SITE
ORION STRING QUARTET WEB SITE
CYBERRECITAL: JEFFREY BIEGEL, PIANIST
STUART MALINA, CONDUCTOR
STEFAN SANDERLIN
WEB Wizard's Favorite Links
Excite
Yahoo
Magellan
Lycos
PC Magazine
Altavista
You can reach me by e-mail at: engineer@gamewood.net
This page was created using
WEB Wizard Version 1.2
Copyright © 1995 ARTA Software Group and David P. Geller