ALTON'S MESSAGES OF THE DAY PAGE A
MESSAGES FOR FRIDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2009
Thought it would be a good idea to create a web page
each day for any messages I would like to write for the day.
If
you would like to read Alton's Mod Supplement Page B for today,
click here
WRITE LOTS OF MESSAGES DAILY ON A WEB PAGE
- READ LOTS OF MESSAGES DAILY ON A WEB PAGE
GOOD MORNING MOD READER FRIENDS AND FELLOW INTERNET SURFERS
AND WELCOME TO ALTON'S MESSAGES OF THE DAY PAGE FOR FRIDAY,
OCTOBER 16, 2009
My complaint about Doesntgivemuchthought totheinsurancehisguardscarrywiththecompany Runny Muttly
Allow me the honor of giving you a brief lesson in Doesntgivemuchthought totheinsurancehisguardscarrywiththecompany Runny Muttly's many possession-obsessed attributes. The following text regards my complaints of recent days against Doesntgivemuchthought totheinsurancehisguardscarrywiththecompany and his subtle but venal attempts to force women to live by restrictive standards not applicable to men. If there's an untold story here, it's that whenever anyone states the obvious -- that our future is hopeless indeed if we do not fight scurrility and slander -- discussion naturally progresses towards the question, "Is he hoping that the readers of this letter won't see the weakness of his argument relative to mine?" That's the question that perplexes me the most, because he had promised us liberty, equality, and fraternity. Instead, Doesntgivemuchthought totheinsurancehisguardscarrywiththecompany gave us paternalism, pessimism, and mysticism. I suppose we should have seen that coming, especially since Doesntgivemuchthought totheinsurancehisguardscarrywiththecompany is not as jejune or scummy as you might think. He's more so. In asserting that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day, he demonstrates an astounding narrowness of vision. Woe to the corrupt, cocky semi-intelligible-types who make human life negligible and cheap! Doesntgivemuchthought totheinsurancehisguardscarrywiththecompany thinks I'm trying to say that his metanarratives are our final line of defense against tyrrany. Wait! I just heard something. Oh, never mind; it's just the sound of the point zooming way over Doesntgivemuchthought totheinsurancehisguardscarrywiththecompany's head.
There are some rotten pinheads who are condescending. There are also some who are conniving. Which category does Doesntgivemuchthought totheinsurancehisguardscarrywiththecompany fall into? If the question overwhelms you, I suggest you check "both".
I hereby publicly condemn Doesntgivemuchthought totheinsurancehisguardscarrywiththecompany's mephitic treatises. In doing so, I publicly proclaim that he is doing everything in his power to make me lie awake at night wondering who his next victim will be. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance. Doesntgivemuchthought totheinsurancehisguardscarrywiththecompany's beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments) were never about tolerance and equality. That was just window dressing for the "innocents". Rather, idle hands are the devil's tools. That's why Doesntgivemuchthought totheinsurancehisguardscarrywiththecompany spends his leisure time devising ever more immoral ways to lure the wrongheaded into his flock. We must shout back at Doesntgivemuchthought totheinsurancehisguardscarrywiththecompany Runny Muttly's propaganda. We must give our propaganda fighters an instrument that is very much needed at this time. And we must introduce an important, but underrepresented, angle on his indecent manuscripts. Please join me in incorporating these words into our living credo.
My complaint about Letstheclientruinthesecuritybusinesswhenhegetsridofolderguards
Ruinny Moughtly
Before Letstheclientruinthesecuritybusinesswhenhegetsridofolderguards Ruinny Moughtly starts ripping tendons and ligaments with his typical knee-jerk reaction to my letters, he should realize that evidence exists to suggest that I hold fast to the view that he has nephelococcygic delusions about being able to don the mantel of immoralism and deny us the opportunity to help people break free of his cycle of oppression. Let me preface my discussion by quickly reasserting a familiar theme of my previous letters: He is reluctant to resolve problems. He always just looks the other way and hopes no one will notice that he not only lies, but he brags about his lying to his compeers. At the very least, if I want to lose my temper, that should be my prerogative. I unmistakably don't need him forcing me to. If you read Letstheclientruinthesecuritybusinesswhenhegetsridofolderguards's writings while mentally out of focus, you may get the sense that the sky is falling. But if you read his writings while mentally in focus and weigh each point carefully, it's clear that his disciples are tools. Like a hammer or an axe, they are not inherently evil or destructive. The evil is in the force that manipulates them and uses them for destructive purposes. That evil is Letstheclientruinthesecuritybusinesswhenhegetsridofolderguards Ruinny Moughtly, who wants nothing less than to focus too much on one side of the equation and not enough on the broader perspective of things. His cat's-paws are unified under a common goal. That goal is to besmirch the memory of some genuine historic figures. Letstheclientruinthesecuritybusinesswhenhegetsridofolderguards says that granting him complete control over our lives is as important as breathing air. This is noxious falsehood. The truth is that his goal is to fight with spiritual weapons that are as soulless as they are subhuman. How rash is that? How militant? How salacious?
Yet there's much more to it than that. Because we have the determination to see the truth prevail, we must never forget that I want to live my life as I see fit. I can't do that while Letstheclientruinthesecuritybusinesswhenhegetsridofolderguards still has the ability to offer stones instead of bread to the emotional and spiritual hungers of the world.
I once overheard Letstheclientruinthesecuritybusinesswhenhegetsridofolderguards say something quite astonishing. Are you strapped in? Letstheclientruinthesecuritybusinesswhenhegetsridofolderguards said that the boogeyman is going to get us if we don't agree to his demands. Can you believe that? At least his statement made me realize that he fervently believes that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. This shows that he is not merely mistaken about one little fact among millions of facts but that Letstheclientruinthesecuritybusinesswhenhegetsridofolderguards's cranky fantasy fits neatly into his dodgy model of society. I don't think anyone questions that. But did you know that his pals are delighted with the potential for violent confrontation? Let me end by citing my standard hate-mail response form letter:
Thank you for your thoughtful reply. One question, though: Do you actually want Letstheclientruinthesecuritybusinesswhenhegetsridofolderguards Ruinny Moughtly to level filth and slime at everyone opposed to his announcements? Because that's what'll happen if we don't expose some of Letstheclientruinthesecuritybusinesswhenhegetsridofolderguards's neo-rabid, bitter deeds.
My complaint about Letstheclientrunthesecuritybusinessandgetsridofolderguards
Rounnie Moghtly
I wanted to respond to Letstheclientrunthesecuritybusinessandgetsridofolderguards Rounnie Moghtly earlier, but I was so busy, I simply did not have the time. Nevertheless, what I need to say is so important, I knew I simply had to allocate a few minutes to write a brief letter on the subject. Note that some of the facts I plan to use in this letter were provided to me by a highly educated person who managed to escape Letstheclientrunthesecuritybusinessandgetsridofolderguards's picayunish indoctrination and is consequently believable.
When it comes to Letstheclientrunthesecuritybusinessandgetsridofolderguards's fibs, I contend that we have drifted along for too long in a state of blissful denial and outright complacency. It's time to seek some structure in which the cacophony introduced by his declamations might be systematized, reconciled, and made rational. The sooner we do that, the better, because I wish that one of the innumerable busybodies who are forever making "statistical studies" about nonsense would instead make a statistical study that means something. For example, I'd like to see a statistical study of Letstheclientrunthesecuritybusinessandgetsridofolderguards's capacity to learn the obvious. Also worthwhile would be a statistical study of how many spiteful busybodies realize that Letstheclientrunthesecuritybusinessandgetsridofolderguards argues that I am bestial for wanting to resolve our disputes without violence. I should point out that this is almost the same argument that was made against Copernicus and Galileo almost half a millennium ago. Letstheclientrunthesecuritybusinessandgetsridofolderguards's arguments would be a lot more effective if they were at least accurate or intelligent, not just a load of bull for the sake of being controversial.
Someone has been giving Letstheclientrunthesecuritybusinessandgetsridofolderguards's brain a very thorough washing, and now Letstheclientrunthesecuritybusinessandgetsridofolderguards is trying to do the same to us. Yes, I realize that he needs to calm down and realize that his generalizations prove that he did little to no research before concluding that his suggestions are Right with a capital R, but for the sake of brevity I've had to express myself in simplified terms. Letstheclientrunthesecuritybusinessandgetsridofolderguards, as usual, you prove yourself to be pouty. Letstheclientrunthesecuritybusinessandgetsridofolderguards Rounnie Moghtly is perfectly willing to show his embarrassingly poor reasoning and warped ethics in print. Do give that some thought.
My complaint about Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher Ronny Mawtlie
May I be cynical for a bit? I hope you don't mind, but with Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher Ronny Mawtlie's latest barrage of sordid ideas, I can't resist the urge to make a few cynical comments. To get immediately to the point, it may seem difficult at first to address the continued social injustice shown by self-absorbed airheads. It is. But many people are shocked when I tell them that enough is enough. And I'm shocked that so many people are shocked. You see, I had thought everybody already knew that Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher's snivelling attempt to construct a creative response to my previous letter was absolutely pitiful. Really, Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher, stringing together a bunch of solecistic insults and seemingly random babble is hardly effective. It simply proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that if I had my druthers, he would never have had the opportunity to pervert human instincts by suppressing natural, feral constraints and encouraging abnormal patterns of behavior. As it stands, vexatious layabouts serve as the priests in Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher's cult of amoral simplism. These "priests" spend their days basking in Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher's reflected glory, pausing only when Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher instructs them to promulgate partisan prejudice against others. What could be more perverted? Fortunately for us, the key to the answer is obvious: A colleague recently informed me that a bunch of ignorant arrogant-types and others in Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher's amen corner are about to dilute the nation's sense of common purpose and shared sacrifice. I have no reason to doubt that story because Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher is trying hard to convince a substantial number of obstreperous braggadocios to lay the foundation for some serious mischief. He presumably believes that the "hundredth-monkey phenomenon" will spontaneously incite noisome card sharks to behave likewise. The reality, however, is that the real question here is not, "Does Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher contend that the boogeyman is going to get us if we don't agree to his demands because it fits his political agenda or because he's too ignorant of the facts to know that this is something that he ignores in his eagerness to jawbone aimlessly?". The real question is rather, "Why, in the name of all that is good and holy, does he want to turn once-flourishing neighborhoods into zones of violence, decay, and moral disregard?" As you ponder the answer to that question, consider that he's a pretty good liar most of the time. However, Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher tells so many lies, he's bound to trip himself up someday. As will become apparent in the near future, I like to speak of Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher as "confused". That's a reasonable term to use, I insist, but let's now try to understand it a little better. For starters, he craves more power. I say we should give Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher more power -- preferably, 10,000 volts of it.
I have two words to say about Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher's maneuvers: crude poppycock. The question, therefore, must not be, "How far do Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher's lies extend?", but rather, "Is it possible for those who defend shabby, dastardly careerism to make their defense look more macabre than it currently is?". The latter question is the better one to ask, because I could go on for pages listing innumerable examples of Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher's conceited publications and simple-minded hijinks. I have already written enough, surely, to convince you that only the impartial and unimpassioned mind will even consider that if I hear Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher's helots say, "Coldhearted jokers should be fêted at wine-and-cheese fund-raisers" one more time, I'm sincerely going to throw up.
The first response to this from Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher's emissaries is perhaps that unfounded attacks on character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best way to make a point. Wrong. Just glance at the facts: Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher argues that everything he says is thoroughly and entirely true. To maintain this thesis, Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher naturally has had to shovel away a mountain of evidence, which he does by the desperate expedient of claiming that there is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of lascivious stereotypes. One wonders how he can complain about beer-guzzling election-year also-rans, given that his own litanies also aim to lead us, lemminglike, over the precipice of self-destruction. There is something grievously wrong with those devious, pernicious rapscallions who incite an atmosphere of violence and endangerment toward the good men, women, and children of this state. Shame on the lot of them!
Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher claims that he is the most recent incarnation of the Buddha. This is a very pusillanimous and unconstructive view and moreover, is wrong in many ways. Someone has to be willing to lead the way to the future, not to the past. Even if it's not polite to do so. Even if it hurts a lot of people's feelings. Even if everyone else is pretending that black is white and night is day. While we do nothing, those who consign our traditional values to the rubbish heap of gnosticism are gloating and smirking. And they will keep on gloating and smirking until we call a spade a spade.
Let's try to understand what handing over our rights to Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher will really mean. It certainly won't mean that we'll be able to freely detail the specific steps and objectives needed to thwart his baleful schemes. No, it will mean witchcraft, beastliness, rape, and murder will become omnipresent in our society. It will mean a descent back into the jungle. He would like to see all of our individual liberties digest in the bowels of an all-powerful State. Yes, I could add that he governs his apple-polishers with a dictatorial and brutal fist, forcing them to defy the law of the land, but I wanted to keep my message simple and direct. I didn't want to distract you from the main thrust of my message, which is that if you think that we have too much freedom, then you're suffering from very serious nearsightedness. You're focusing too much on what Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher wants you to see and failing to observe many other things of much greater importance, such as that in the Old Testament, the Book of Kings relates how the priests of Baal were slain for deceiving the people. I'm not suggesting that there be any contemporary parallel involving Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher, but Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher is reluctant to resolve problems. He always just looks the other way and hopes no one will notice that he is out to instill a general ennui. And when we play his game, we become accomplices. Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher's assistants suspect that the media should "create" news rather than report it. I say to them, "Prove it" -- not that they'll be able to, of course, but because Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher's asseverations are designed to reopen wounds that seem scarcely healed. And they're working; they're having the desired effect. Finally, if this letter generates a response from someone of opposing viewpoints, I would hope that the author(s) concentrate on offering objections to my ideas while refraining from attacks on my person or my intelligence. I've gotten enough of that already from Acrookedunfairuntrustworthyjobsnatcher Ronny Mawtlie.
FAVORITE LINKS
WEB Wizard's Favorite Links
EXCITE
Yahoo
WEB Crawler
Magellan
Lycos
Dilbert
PC Magazine
The Whitehouse
Altavista
Alton's Web Pages
Alton's Web Pages Index
Alton's Chat Forum Web Page
You can reach me by e-mail at:
engineer@gamewood.net
This page was created using
WEB Wizard Version 1.2
Copyright © 1995 ARTA Software Group and David P. Geller